• A Fierce Advocate Proven Track Record of Success
  • Honesty and Passion
  • Ambition, Experience and Focus Extraordinary Results

A Montana teacher, Stacey Dean Rambold, was charged with three counts of sexual intercourse without consent in 2008. Rambold plead guilty to the rape and he was sentenced in August and released from a Montana prison on probation the next month. The teenage victim, Cherise Morales, took her own life in 2010.

Montana is now fighting to get Rambold back behind bars after he served only 31 days for raping a 14-year-old girl. Prosecutors filed an appeal Friday questioning the controversial 31-day sentence imposed on Rambold.

“The circumstance of a 47-year-old teacher having sexual intercourse with his 14-year-old student is precisely such a circumstance warranting a mandatory minimum sentence,” the appeal document said.

I’m often asked to write about real cases that I’ve handled and/or learned about first hand that provide insight into the criminal justice arena. Here’s one that I remember that sheds light on how random a defendant’s bond can be.

I was involved in a Florida criminal case where the defendant was a trusted bookkeeper for a very successful Miami company. Over the course of a two year period, it was uncovered that she stole money at least once a week. Because every time she stole money from the company the amount was over $300, she was facing felony grand theft charges for every act of theft. That means that she could have been charged with approximately one hundred separate counts of grand theft, each punishable by a maximum penalty of up to five years in prison. Additionally, every count carries with it a separate bond amount. For each count of grand theft in the third degree (amount taken is between $300 and $5000), the bond amount is $5000. That means, assuming she stole on one hundred separate occasions, her bond amount would be $500,000. Also, she’d be facing up to five hundred years in prison.

Fortunately for her, she was charged with one count of organized scheme to defraud. The charge takes all the separate acts of theft together and combines them into one scheme to defraud made up of numerous separate acts of theft. It’s a felony in the first degree, punishable by a statutory maximum sentence of up to thirty years in prison, carrying a standard bond amount of $15,000.

When deciding whether an arrestee is guilty of a crime, the public typically will ask, “Well, what’s the evidence?” When they hear that the chemist made a determination about something, they believe that they can rely upon it. Why would someone in the scientific community like a chemist and/or toxicologist lie and/or manufacture evidence? Well, ask Annie Dookhan.

Annie Dookhan, a former Massachusetts state chemist, was just sentenced to three to five years in prison after entering guilty pleas to 27 criminal charges, including, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice and perjury. She was involved in an extensive scheme to defraud over nine years which included lying about the presence of drugs in test samples. A review of her work revealed that she falsified tests, lied about her academic credentials while testifying at trials, and forged initials of an evidence officer to conceal her misconduct.

While the state believes that approximately 40,000 cases may have been compromised by this woman, the ACLU believes the number is much higher. The lab in which Dookhan worked handled more than 100,000 cases while she was employed there.

Kalief Browder, a Bronx, N.Y. native, was only 16-years-old when cops unexpectedly showed up and stripped him of his liberty while he was walking home from a party. A person who Browder never met before accused him of robbery. Browder’s nightmare began.

The teen spent the next three years jailed on Rikers Island. Neither he nor his family were able to post the $10,000 bond set in his case. Browder’s attorney said that the whole case hinged exclusively on the word of the alleged victim who was pointing his finger at the teen. Apparently, the alleged victim approached cops two weeks after he was robbed and claimed, “That kid did it.” Based solely on that evidence, cops went into action and arrested Browder.

At one court appearance during his three year ordeal, Browder was threatened by the judge that if he didn’t take the plea offer, he’d receive a 15-year prison sentence after conviction. Not surprisingly, Browder became desperate and suicidal, after multiple court appearances with no resolution in site.

Remember back a month ago when Polk County, Florida sheriff, Grady Judd was everywhere. It seemed that there was no media appearance too small for him to do. He was oozing with passion and excitement in front of the cameras while showcasing to the world that two juveniles, a 12 and 14 year-old, were arrested for a horrible crime. While literally holding their photographs, he announced their names to the world and alleged that the girls’ cyberbullying caused another teenager to commit suicide. Fueling his fire more was an alleged remorseless Facebook post by the older arrested teen wherein she allegedly shrugged off the suicide. Without question, the girls, charged with felony aggravated stalking, were vilified.

In a move that shocked many, including this veteran of the criminal justice arena, this week, prosecutors dropped charges against both teens. Apparently, AFTER the teens’ arrest, prosecutors carefully combed through and analyzed thousands of Facebook chats. One of the lawyers for the teens claimed that the 27,000 Facebook pages showed absolutely no evidence that either teen committed a crime. Rather, he alleged that there was evidence that the 12 year-old defendant was bullied by the alleged victim. Prosecutors aren’t commenting, claiming they can’t speak about the case because the law precludes them from speaking about cases involving juvenile defendants.

Sheriff Judd doesn’t feel the need to apologize. On the contrary, he claims that he has no regrets and that Florida law permits him to release the names of any and all juveniles charged with felonies. Further, he said that he believed he had probable cause to make an arrest and that prosecutors have the right to decide whether to move forward on a case. He told reporters that he is proud of the fact that he “raised awareness and helped kids.”

This is an actual criminal case. The only thing I did was change the defendants’ names. Marley and Snoop (we’ll call them) were charged with trafficking in cannabis, pursuant to Florida Criminal Statute 893.135(1)(a). Both ganja loving defendants were facing a potential three year minimum mandatory prison sentence if the total weight of the pot seized was over twenty-five pounds. Unfortunately for them, when cops weighed the “Devil’s Grass,” (I’ve got many names for pot) it totaled twenty-six pounds.

Their attorneys did exactly what I’ve done on many similar cases that I’ve defended here in Florida. They called Dr. Terry Hall. I’ve used this expert in a number of cases. Marley and Snoop had him re-weigh the cannabis, hoping that maybe the cops’ doughnuts and/or handguns were left on the scale when the pot was originally weighed, causing a pound or two increase. (note: Not all cops eat doughnuts. That was a stereotype used to obtain a cheap chuckle)

What Dr. Hall did discover was that a pool of liquid formed at the bottom of the container holding the marijuana and packaging. This was the potential break the defendants were looking for. After Dr. Hall re-weighed the cannabis without the liquid and the packaging, it weighed only twenty-four pounds. Yay!!!! There goes the three year minimum mandatory stint in the pokey, right? Not so fast.

Many have commented about the fairness of George Zimmerman’s bond hearing conducted yesterday in Seminole County, Florida. Some think he got off light since the prosecutors were seeking a bond of $50,000. Others wonder why the bond was increased to $9000 when the standard bond for the same three criminal offenses was only $4,900. So, was Zimmerman treated fairly?

At the hearing, Judge Fred Schott was told by prosecutor Lymary Munoz that Zimmerman’s girlfriend revealed to law enforcement that he not only pointed a shotgun at her and broke her table on Monday, but also disclosed that he tried to strangle her just ten days earlier. The prosecutor passionately told the judge that the alleged victim is afraid of Zimmerman.

While the alleged choking is not charged by prosecutors at this time, the judge did refer to it as the reason for increasing the bond from the standard amount. Additionally, the judge ordered Zimmerman to stay away from the alleged victim’s residence. Zimmerman has been living there for the past three months. He was also ordered not to have any contact with her, surrender all of his guns, and must also wear a satellite monitor.

Just hours before white supremacist serial killer Joseph Paul Franklin was scheduled to be killed via lethal injection, U.S. District Judge in Missouri, Nanette Laughreyin, granted stay of execution, citing concerns over Missouri’s new execution method.

Franklin is challenging Missouri’s drug choice of pentobarbital for the lethal injection procedure. He argues that the use of this drug violates his eighth amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment. The federal judge ruled that the lawsuit filed by Franklin and 20 other death row inmates challenging Missouri’s execution procedure must be resolved before Franklin is definitively put to death by lethal injection.

Franklin is allegedly responsible for murdering 22 people between 1977 and 1980. Franklin confessed to many murders and was convicted of eight murders total — two in Cincinnati, two in Salt Lake City, two in Madison, Wisconsin, one in Chattanooga, Tennessee, and another in St. Louis, Missouri.

By now, you’ve probably heard that George Zimmerman was re-arrested. This time, he’s charged with felony aggravated assault and two misdemeanors, domestic violence battery and criminal mischief. The arrest occurred this Monday, approximately 1:30 p.m. in Apopka, Florida.

Zimmerman’s girlfriend alleges, as memorialized in the arrest report, that he pointed his shotgun at her “for one minute.” Additionally, she alleges that just before committing the aggravated assault, he broke her table using the butt of his shot gun. (hence, the criminal mischief charge) The basis for the domestic violence battery charge stems from her allegation that he pushed her.

The alleged victim’s 911 call seems to corroborate what she is alleging. Zimmerman also called 911, however, had a different version as to what took place. He alleges that his girlfriend was, “for lack of a better term, going crazy on me.” He further explained to the 911 operator that she was throwing all his property out. Zimmerman further claimed that while he did have a firearm with him, he never pulled it out, keeping it locked safely in his bag. Regarding the busted table, Zimmerman alleges that his girlfriend did it.

Many may not be surprised to learn of this one. Just hours ago, George Zimmerman was re-arrested and charged with a “domestic violence related offense.” Seminole County Sheriff’s Office deputies arrested Zimmerman in Central Florida after receiving a call concerning a “disturbance.”

At the time of writing this blog entry, no other details were released by law enforcement. He will be booked at the jail and will not be able to post the bond until first seeing a judge, who, by law, will order him to have no contact with the alleged victim.

TMZ is reporting that the alleged victim is Zimmerman’s girlfriend. They also are reporting that she is alleging that she is pregnant.

Contact Information